Citizens Bank · FastLine

Cutting HELOC Approvals in Half

A 50% shorter application and approval process for one of the most stressful products in consumer finance.

A before-and-after journey map: a twelve-step paper-era application flow measured in weeks above, a six-step digital flow measured in days below, with a fifty percent pull-stat.

A note on what you're seeing. I take my clients' confidentiality seriously. The artifacts on this page are re-creations and abstractions of the real work, and the numbers are illustrative of project outcomes rather than audited figures. Happy to walk you through the genuine article — just ask.

Role
Senior UX Designer (via Wongdoody)
Engagement
Roughly six-month contract
Tools
Figma, usability studies, UX writing, illustration
The win
50% faster application & approval

The situation

A HELOC is a big, frightening, document-heavy decision — and the process was doing nothing to help.

Home-equity lines of credit sit at the intersection of every anxiety consumer finance can produce: large sums, your actual house as collateral, weeks of silence, and a paperwork trail that assumes you have a fax machine. People don't abandon these applications because they changed their mind. They abandon them because they lost the thread.

FastLine set out to make the whole thing fast and humane — not just digitised, but genuinely shorter, and legible at every step so an applicant always knows where they stand.

My role

I was the senior UX designer on the experience, working inside a critique-heavy weekly rhythm with product owners and bank stakeholders. Unusually for a project this size, I carried wireframes, UX writing and custom illustration in the same hand — which meant the tone of a screen and the shape of a screen got designed together rather than negotiated afterwards.

The process

Beat one

Working in the open

Weekly design presentations to product owners and stakeholders. Designing in public is slower on any given Tuesday and dramatically faster over a quarter — decisions get made once, in the room, with the people who can make them.

Beat two

Usability studies driving decisions

The studies kept pointing at the same wound: waiting. Applicants could tolerate a long process; they could not tolerate an opaque one. That reframed the brief from “fewer screens” to “never leave someone wondering,” and it's what drove the status tracker below.

Three frames of the application status tracker side by side: a loose sketch, a grey-box wireframe, and the finished interface with a four-step progress rail.
Illustrative The status tracker, sketch to shipped. The decision the artifact records: show waiting as progress. A step that says “we're verifying, about two days” costs the same to build as a spinner and buys far more patience.

Beat three

Full-stack craft

Wireframes, the words on them, and the illustrations beside them. Bank language is a design problem: most of what makes a financial form frightening is vocabulary, not layout.

Three red-lined UX writing edits: bank-speak struck through on the left, plain-language replacements on the right, each with a short rationale.
Illustrative Red-lined copy edits. “Verify liability obligations” becomes “Tell us what you owe.” Same question, one-tenth the dread.
A warm spot illustration of two hands passing a small stack of documents, with a gold checkmark above and the line Two documents. That's it.
Illustrative A spot illustration for the document-upload step — the heaviest moment in the flow. The picture's whole job is to promise that the pile is small.

Beat four

High-fidelity prototypes

Clickable Figma prototypes for validation and for handoff. Testing a real flow rather than a deck is the difference between “stakeholders liked it” and “applicants got through it.”

A ranch house at golden hour with a sprinkler caught mid-arc across the lawn.

50%*

The outcome

A 50% shorter application-and-approval process. The redesign was explicitly built to reduce abandoned applications and applicant anxiety — every step removed was a place people used to give up.

Reflection

“Finance UX is trust UX. Every screen either earns confidence or spends it.”

What I'd push further: the waiting states. We made them honest, but honest isn't the same as reassuring. Given another pass I'd design the silences as deliberately as the screens — what a bank says on day four of a quiet week is worth as much as anything in the form.

Next up · Expedia Group

Making the Platform Developers Choose